|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The US Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs (also called IIP) describes itself as follows:
Among other things, IIP operates the America.gov website to deliver "information about current U.S. foreign policy and about American life and culture."[2]. America.gov is the successor to the USINFO website, although some languages are still available only on USINFO. The Bureau prides itself on using cutting-edge technology and strategic alliances to improve its effectiveness. The Bureau's products and services--including web sites and other internet services, electronic journals, speaker programs, print publications, and CD-ROMs--uniquely are designed to support the State Department's initiatives, as well as those of other U.S. foreign policy organizations. It also manages Information Resource Centers overseas and offers reference specialists based in Washington, DC, to answer specialized information queries from abroad. The IIP was created from elements of the U.S. Information Agency when it merged with the Department of State on October 1, 1999. It is headed by the U.S. Assistant Secretary of State For International Information Programs; Michael S. Doran has been nominated to fill the now-vacant office.
The OrganizationOperating as a reinvention laboratory through its team-based management structure, the IIP comprises three offices:
Screening of speakersThe Bureau runs the U.S. Speaker and Specialist Program, which selects U.S. experts to deliver lectures, serve as consultants and conduct seminars, either overseas or from the United States via teleconferences. Senator Joe Biden requested a review of the program after a December 2005 story in which State Department officials said that political litmus tests were being used to weed out speakers critical of the Bush administration. In September 2006, a report by the department's Inspector General's Office said that U.S. officials screened the public statements and writings of private citizens for criticism of the Bush administration before deciding whether to send them on foreign speaking assignments. The screenings amounted to "virtual censorship" in the State Department's selection of speakers, said the 22-page report.1 See also
Notes
External links
|
| All Right Reserved © 2007, Designed by Stylish Blog. |